Questions about Taxes

     Cases Admitting Testimony Concerning the Parental Alienation Syndrome

1987

Coursey v. Superior Court (Coursey), 194 Cal.App.3d 147,239 Cal.Rptr. 365

(Cal.App. 3 Dist., Aug 18, 1987.

1988

Schutz v. Schutz, 522 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 3rd Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Oosterhaus v. Short, District Court, County of Boulder (CO), Case No.

85DR1737-Div III.

1990

Rosen v. Edwards (1990) Tolbert, J. (1990), AR v. SE. New York Law Journal,

December 11:27-28.

The December 11, 1990 issue of The New York Law Journal [pages 27-28]

reprinted, in toto, the ruling of Hon. J. Tolbert of the Westchester Family

Court in Westchester Co.

Ochs et al. v. Myers, App. No. 04-89-00007-CV. Ct. of App. of TX, 4th Dist.,

San Antonio; 789 S.W. 2d 949; 1990 Tex App. Lexis 1652, May 16, 1990.

1991

In re Violetta 210 III.App.3d 521, 568 N.E2d 1345, 154 III.Dec. 896(Ill.App. I

Dist Mar 07, 1991).

Karen B v. Clyde M., Family Court of New York, Fulton County, 151 Misc. 2d

794; 574 N.Y. 2d 267, 1991.

Stuart-Mills, P. v. Cher, A.J.., Sup. Ct. Quebec, Dist. of Montreal, No.

500-12-184613-895 (1991).

Rothwell v. Kisko, 1991 CarswellOnt 1326. Ontario Crt of Just. (Gen'l Div.)

Docket# 36429/89, Mar 21, 1991.

1992

Sims v. Hornsby, 1992 WL 193682 (Ohio App. 12 Dist., Butler County, Aug 10

1992).

Zigmont v. Toto, 1992 WL 6034 (Ohio App. 8 Dist Cuyahoga County, Jan 16,

1992).

Krebsbach v. Gallagher, Supreme Court, App. Div., 181 A.D.2d 363; 587 N.Y.S.

2d 346, (1992).

V. (L.) C. H. (E.), 1992 CarswellQue 169; 45 Q.A.C. 100; 1992 R.J.Q. 855; 1992

R.D.F. 316 Cour d'appel du Quebec, Feb 26, 1992.

1993

Karen PP. v. Clyde QC. Sup Ct of NY, App Div, 3rd Dept. 197 A.D. 2d 753; 602

N.Y.s. 2d 709; 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9845.

Davy v. Davy, Ontario Court of Justice (Gen'l Div)Docket 92-gd-21948. 1993

CarswellOnt 1630;1993 W.D.F.L 1535. Oct 7, 1993.

Badakhshan v. Moradi, Nova Scotia Fam Court. 1993 CarswellNS 423;120

N.S.R.(2d) 405; 332 A.P.R. 405. Mar 2, 1993.

1994

In re Marriage of Rosenfeld, 524 N.W. 2d 212 (Iowa App., Aug 25 1994) McCoy v.

State 886 P.2d 252 (Wyo.,Nov 30, 1994).

McCoy v State of Wyoming, 886 P.2d 252, 1994.

Sidman v. Zager, Family Court, Tompkins County, NY: V-1467-8-9-94.

Truax v. Truax, 110 Nev. 437, 874 P. 2d 10 (Nev., May 19, 1994).

R.M c. B.R, [1994] A.Q. no 947. DRS 95-09809 No 200-09-000440-948

(200-12-042928-904 C.S.Q.) (Quebec, decision in french only) Oct. 28, 1994.

1995

Blackshear v. Blackshear, Hillsborough County, FL 13th Jud. Circuit: 95-08436.

Conner v. Renz, 1995 WL 23365 (Ohio App. 4 Dist., Athens County, Jan 19,

1995).

State v. Koelling, 1995 WL 125933 (Ohio App. 10 Dist., Franklin County, Mar

21, 1995).

White v. White, 1995 (Indiana Court of Appeals) 655 N.E.2d 523. (Ind. App.,

Aug 31, 1995).

1996

Lubkin v. Lubkin, 92-M-46LD Hillsborough County, NH. (Southern District, Sept.

5, 1996).

Blosser v. Blosser, 707 So. 2d 778; 1998 Fla. App. Case No. 96-03534.

Case v. Richardson, 1996 WL 434281 (Conn. Super.,Jul 16, 1996).

John W. v. Phillip W., 41 Cal.App.4th 961, 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 899; 1996.

Tucker v. Greenberg, 674 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

Elliott v. Elliott, A.J. No. 74 DRS 96-05285 Action No. 4806-10272 Alberta Crt

of Queen's Bench, Jud. Dist. of Lethbridge/Macleod, Jan 25, 1996.

Elliott v. Elliott, 1996 CarswellAlta 95, 193 A.R. 177, 135 W.A.C. 177, 27

R.F.L. (4th) 23 Alberta Court of Appeals. Nov 7, 1996 (Affirmed--Appeal

Dismissed)

Fortin v. Major, O.J. No. 3805 DRS 97-01672, Court File No. 49729/94 Ontario

Crt of Justice (Gen'l Div: Ottawa), Oct 25, 1996.

1997

Janelle S. v. J.R.S., Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 4. 1997 Wisc.

App. LEXIS 1124 (1997).

Johnson v. Johnson, 4806-11508A. FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA, July 7, 1997.

Johnson v.Johnson, Appeal No. SA1 of 1997 No.AD6182 of 1993, 7 July 1997.

1998

Ange, Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1998 Va. App. Lexis 59 (1998).

Metza v. Metza, Sup. Court of Connecticut, Jud. Dist. of Fairfield, at

Bridgeport, 1998 Conn. Super. Lexis 2727 (1998).

Pisani v. Pisani, Court of Appeals of Ohio, 8th App. Dist. Cuyahoga Cty. 1998

Ohio App. Lexis 4421 (1998).

Pathan v. Pathan, Case No. 96-OS-1. Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County,

OH, Div. of Dom Rel.

Pathan v. Pathan, C.A. Case No. 17729. Ct. of App. of OH, 2d Dist.,

Montgomery County; 2000 Ohio App. Lexis 119. Jan. 21, 2000

Anonymous v. Anonymous, Case No. 2xv178, Rinteln (Circuit Court) Germany, Apr.

27, 1998.

Fischer v. Fischer, Ct. of App. of WI, Dist. Two, No. 97-2067; 221 Wis. 2d

221; 584 N.W.2d 233; 1998 Wisc. App. Lexis 1534.

1999

Valerie Edlund v. Gregory Hales, 66 Cal. App 4th 1454; 78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 671.

Popovice v. Popovice, Court of Common Pleas, Northampton Cty, PA. Aug 11,

1999, No. 1996-C-2009.

Waldrop v. Waldrop, in Chancery No. 138517. Fairfax County Circuit Court,(Va.,

April 26, 1999).

In the matter of J.F. v. L.F., Fam. Ct. of NY, Westchester Cty, 181 Misc 2d

722; 694 N.Y.S. 2d 592; 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 357.

Demers v. Demers, Ontario Superior Court, Docket: Kingston 54253/96. 1999

CarswellOnt 2621. June 8, 1999.

McLelland v. McLelland, British Columbia Supreme Court Docket: Nanaimo 07907.

1999 CarswellBC 1706. July 2, 1999.

S.O. v. S.C.O, N.B.J. No. 326, Proceeding No. FDSJ-400-98. New Brunswick Crt

of Queen's Bench, Family Division-Jud. Dist. of St. John. Jul 28, 1999.

In re Marriage of Divelbiss v. Divelbiss, No. 2-98-0999 2nd District,

Ill.(Appeal from Circ Crt of Du Page Cty No. 93-D-559) Oct 22, 1999.

2000

Jefferson v. Jerfferson, New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench Docket:

FDSJ-6408.95. 2000 CarswellNB 15. Jan 18, 2000.

Berg-Perlow v. Perlow, 15th Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Fl.,Case no.

CD98-1285-FC. Mar 15, 2000.

An exceptionally strong family court decision in which five experts

testified to the diagnosis of PAS.

Tetzlaff v. Tetzlaff, Civil Court of Cook County, Il., Domestic Relations

Division, Cause No. 97D 2127, Mar 20, 2000.

Sch. v. Sch., Kammergericht KG Berlin. vom 30 Mai 2000 - 17 UF 1413/99.

Orszak v. Orszak, Ontario Superior Court of Justice Docket: 97-FP-234664. 2000

CarswellOnt 1574. May 5, 2000.

Fundstelle: Fam RZ 2000, 1606 (Heft 24 / 2000 vom 15. Dezember 2000)

"1 1 1671, 1696 BGB: Bedeutung des Parental Alienation Syndroms im

AbΣnderungsverfahren" - Hervorhebungen durch Fettschrift -

Beschluss 17 UF 1413/99 - Volltext der Entscheidung

(136 F11 514/98 AG Berlin (Tempelhof-Kreuzberg Germany)

Anon v. Anon, OLG Ffm vom 13.07.2000 unter Az. 5 WF 112/00,(Germany).

Anon v. Anon, OLG Ffm vom 26.10.2000 unter Az. 6 WF 168/00,(Germany).

Chambers v. Chambers, Ct of App of AR, Div 2; 2000 Ark App. LEXIS 476, June

21, 2000.

Pearson v. Pearson, Sup Ct. of AK., No. S-8973, No. 5297, 5 P.3d 239; 2000

Alas. Lexis 69. July 7, 2000.

Wilkins v Wilkins, Family Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, La., Civ. No.

90792. Nov. 2, 2000.

Oliver V. v. Kelly V., NY Sup. Ct. Part 12. New York Law Journal Nov. 27,

2000.

Loten v. Ryan, 15th Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, FL., Case No. CD 93-6567

FA. Dec 11,2000.

Toope v. Toope, 2000 CarswellNfld 185, 8 R.F.L. (5th) 446, 193 Nfld. &

P.E.I.R. 313, 582 A.P.R. 313. New Foundland Unified Family Court June 15,

2000.

R.F. v. S.P., [2000] Q.J. Np. 3412 No. 500-12-250739-004 Quebec Superior Court

(Montreal) Oct. 13, 2000.

2001

Berry v. Berry, Circuit Court of Tuscaloosa County, AL, Case No. DR-96-761.01.

Jan 06, 2001

Kilgore v. Boyd, 13th Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, FL., Case No.

94-7573, 733 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) Jan 30, 2001.

Boyd v. Kilgore, 773 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (Prohibition Denied)

Court ruling that the Parental Alienation Syndrome has gained general

acceptance in the scientific community and thereby satisfies Frye Test

criteria for admissibility.

McDonald v. McDonald, 9th Judicial Circuit Court, Orange County, FL. Case No.

D-R90-11079, Feb 20, 1001.

Menard v. Menard, Sup. Ct of British Columbia, 2001 CarswellBC 1312; 2001 BCSC

430, Mar 21, 2001.

2002

Bates v. Bates 18th Judicial Circuit, Dupage County, IL Case No. 99D958, Jan

17, 2002.

Court ruling that the Parental Alienation Syndrome has gained general

acceptance in the scientific community and thereby satisfies Frye Test

criteria for admissibility.[excerpt]

Re: C (Children) (2002) CA (Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss P, Thorpe LJ, Kay LJ)

20/2/2002 COURT OF APPEAL REF: 2001/1642. (Great Britain)